ART 124
Arbitrary Detention- any public officer or employee without legal
ground detain a person shall suffer
1. Penalty of ARRESTO mayor in its maximum to
PRISON CORRECTIONAL in its minimum, if detention has not exceed (3)tree days
2. Penalty of Prison Correctional medium and
maximum detention more than (3) three days but not more than (15) fifteen days
3. Penalty
of PRISON mayor if detention has continued more than 15 days but not more than (6) six months
4. RECLUSION TEMPORAL, if detention shall exceed
(6) six months
The commission of a crime, or violent insanity
or any other ailment requiring the compulsory legal ground for the detention of
any person.
Elements:
1.
That
the offender if a public officer or employee
2.
That he
detains a person
3.
That
the detention is without legal ground
Private
person Art 267 and Art268
Detention
– is defined as the actual confinement of a person in an enclosure or in any
manner detaining and depriving him of his liberty.
Legal
ground for the detention of any person
(a)
Commission
of a crime
(b)
Violation
insanity or any other ailment requirement the compulsory confinement of the
patient in a hospital
(c)
If the
person is an escape prison
Plain view Doctrine
-
Objects
are perceptible but an officer must who rightfully to observe and cease the
object without search warrant.
-
Object
that was cease could be use admissible against to the accused motion to
suppress evidence
3
three requisite
1.
Law
enforcement officer has prior justification for a intrusion
2.
Discovery
of evidence in plain view doctrine is inadvertent
3.
Immediate
apparent that the item is an evidence of a crime.
Arresto
without warrant
1.
When in
his presence, the person to be arrested has committed is actually committing,
or is attempting to commit an offence
2.
When an
offence has in fact just been committed, and he has probable cause to believed
based on personal knowledge of the facts and circumstances that the person to
be arrested has committed it; and
3.
When
the person to be arrested is a prisoner who has escaped from a penal
establishment or place where he is serving final judgment or temporary confined
while his case is pending, or has escaped while being transferred from one
confinement to another.
Art 125
Delay in the delivery of detained persons
Element
1.
That
the offender is a public officer or employee
2.
That he
has detained a person for some legal ground
3.
That he
fails to deliver such person to the proper judicial authorities within
a.
Twelve
(12) hrs. for offence of light penalties
b.
Eighteen
(18) hrs for offence of prison correctional
c.
Thirty
six (36) hrs for offence of capital and afflictive offence
Art
125 does not apply when the arrest is by virtue of a warrant of arrest
Rights
1.
He
shall be informed of the cause of his detention
2.
He
shall be allowed upoin his request to communicate and confor at anytime w/ his
attorney of counsel.
Detention
under RA 9372
ART 126
Delaying release
(a) By delaying the performance of judicial or
executive order for the liberation of such person
(b) That the offender without good reason delays
a.
The
service of the notice order to the prisoner or
b.
The
performance of such judicial or executive order for the release of the prisoner
or
c.
The
proceedings upon a petition for the release of such person
(c) That the offender is a public officer or
employee
Act
1. Delaying release
2. Unduly delaying the service
3. Unduly delaying the proceedings
Art 127
Expulsion – the penalty of
PRISSION CORRECTIONAL shall be imposed upon any public officer or employee who,
not being thereunto authorized by law, shall expel any person from the Phil.
Island or shall compel such person to change his residence
Two acts
1. By expelling a person from the Phil.(The
president)
2. By compelling a person to change his residence (Court)
Element
1. That the offender is a public officer or
employee
2. That he expels any person from the Phil. or
compels a person to change his residence
3. That the offender is not authorized to do so
by law.
Ex. Villavicencio et al. vs
Lukban
Violation of domicile
1. Art. 128 – violation of domicile
2. Art. 129 – Search and warrant maliciously
obtained, and abuse in the service of those legally obtained
3. Art. 130-Searching domicile without witness
Art 128
Violation of domicile – the
penalty of prison correctional in its minimum period shall be imposed upon any
public officer or employee
Offence committed in the
nighttime, or if any papers or effect not constituting evidence of a crime be
not returned immediately after the search made by the offender the penalty
shall be prison correctional in its medium and max period
Acts
1. By entering and dwelling against the will of
the owner therof;
2. By searching to leave the premises, after
having surreptitiously entered said
dwelling and after having been required to leave the same
3. By refusing to leave the premises
Element
(a) That the offender is a public officer or
employee
(b) That he is not authorized by judicial order to
enter the dwelling and/ or to make a search therein for papers or other effects
Circumstance qualifying the
offence
(a) If the offence is committed at nightime or
(b) If the person or effect not constituting
evidence of a crime are not returned immediately after the search made by the
offender
RULE 113 Sec 11 RRCP-
breaking into building allowed but with search warrant
Art 129
Search warrant maliciously
obtained, and abuse in the service of those legally obtained
In addition to the liability attaching the
offender for the commission of any other offence, the penalty to ARRESTO MAYOR
in its maximum period to PRISON CORRECTIONAL in its minimum period and a fine
of 1K shall be imposed upon any public officer or employee who shall be imposed
upon any public officer or employee who shall procure a search warrant without
just cause or, having legally procured the same, shall exceed his authority or
use unnecessary severity in executing the same.
Act
1. By procuring a search warrant without just
cause
2. By exceeding his authority or by using unnecessary
in executing a search want legally procured
Element
1. That the offender is a public officer or
employee
2. That he
procures a search warrant
3. That there is no just cause
Search warrant – is an order in writing issued in the name of
the PP signed by the judge and directed to a peace officer
Rule 126 sec1 RRCP
Personal property to be
seized
(a) Subject of the offence
(b) Stolen or embezzled and other proceed or fruit
of the offense
(c) Used or intended to be used as the means of
committing an offence Rule 126 Sec3
Req
1. Search warrant shall not issue except upon
probable cause in connection with 1 specific offense to be determined
personally by the judge after examination under oath or affirmation of the
complainant and the witnesses he may produce
Rule 126 sec4
Rule 125 sec 5 – there is record sworn statement with any
affidavit submitted
Rule 126 sec 8 search warrant 2 witness
Search warrant id good for 10 days only
Rule 126 sec 12 RRCP – seized without search warrant
Peace officer can enter
provided the unlawful conduct is such as to affect the public peace.
Probable cause – for a search warrant is defined as such
fact and circumstances which would lead a reasonable discreet and prudent man
to believe that an offense has been committed.
In vessel is legal
Element of exceeding authority
(a) That the offender is a public officer or
employee
(b) That he has legally procured a search warrant
(c) The he exceeds his authority or uses
unnecessary severity in executing the same
Art 130
Searching domicile without witnesses – the penalty of arresto mayor in its medium
and maximum period shall be imposed upon a public officer or employee who, in
case were search is proper, shall search the domicile, paper, or other
belonging of any person in the absence of the latter, any member of his family
or in their default, without the presence of two witnesses residing in the same
locality
Art 130 does not apply to
searches of vehicles
Art 131
Prohibiting, interrupting
and dissolution of peaceful meeting – penalty Prision correctional in its
minimum period
1. By prohibiting or interrupting, without legal
ground, the holding of a peaceful meeting or dissolving the same
2. By hindering any person from joining any
lawful association or from attending any of its meetings.
3. By prohibiting or hindering any person from
addressing either alone or together with others, any petition to the
authorities for the correction of abuse or redress of grievances.
Element
1. That the offender is a public officer or
employee
2. That he performs any of the acts mentioned above.
Art 132
Interrupting of religious
worship – Penalty prision correctional in its minimum period, Violence and
treat the penalty shall be prison correctional medium and maximum periods
Element
1. That the offender is a public officer or
employee
2. That religious ceremonies or manifestation of
any religion are about to take place or going on
3. That the offender prevents or disturbs the
same.
Art 133
Offending the religious
feelings – the penalty of arresto mayor in its maximum period to prison
correctional in its minimum period shall be imposed upon anyone who, in a place
devoted of any religious ceremony, shall perform acts notoriously offensive to
the feeling of the faithful.
Elements
1. That the offender is a public officer or
employee
2. That religious ceremonies or manifestation of
any religious are about to take place or going on
3. That the offender prevents or disturbs the
same
Art 133
Offending the religious
feelings – the penalty of arresto mayor in its maximum period to prison
correctional I its minimum period shall be imposed upon anyone who, in a place
devoted of any religious ceremony, shall perform acts notoriously offensive to
the feeling of the faithful
Elements
1. That the act complained of were performed
a.
A place
devoted to religious worship
b.
During
the celebration of any religios ceremony
2. That the acts must be notoriously offensive to
the feelings of the faithful
Religious
practice or dogma or ritual
Do you need to find a criminal lawyer to hire because you find yourself in some trouble that you don't know how to handle on your own? Then you first need to understand the important factors that must be considered before you choose any lawyer to hire. Criminal Lawyer in Surrey provides criminal services related to murder, drug smuggling and trafficking, human trafficking cases.
ReplyDelete